The problem this solves
Churn arrives as a surprise: the account looked fine, then the cancellation email came. Feedback is anecdotal - whatever the loudest customer said to whoever picked up. NPS was run once, in a survey tool nobody checks, and the results live in a slide from last year. Success managers each track their accounts in a personal spreadsheet, so 'how healthy is our book of business' has no answer two people would give the same way.
How we work
We design the feedback program before touching configuration: which survey type fits which moment (CSAT after ticket resolution, NPS on a relationship cadence, CES after onboarding), which audience gets it, and crucially what happens to each response. A survey nobody acts on is just politely bothering customers.
Then we implement in Service Hub: surveys with sensible triggers, detractor responses opening tickets and alerting the account owner the same day, promoters routed toward reviews and references. Alongside surveys we assemble health signals from data you already have - support volume and severity, engagement, survey trend - into properties a success manager can sort a book of business by.
The engagement closes with dashboards and a working session on the response playbook: who acts on what, within what window.
Deliverables
- Feedback program design: survey types, triggers, audiences
- NPS, CSAT, and CES surveys configured in Service Hub
- Detractor alert and follow-up workflows
- Promoter routing toward reviews and references
- Customer health signal model on account records
- Success dashboards and a response playbook
What buyers ask before scoping.
Should we run NPS, CSAT, and CES all at once?
Usually no. Start with the survey that answers your sharpest question: CSAT if support quality is the unknown, NPS if relationship risk is. Add the others once the first one has a working response loop. Over-surveying tanks response rates and trains customers to ignore you.
We already run surveys in Typeform. Why move them?
The value is not the form, it is the response landing on the CRM record and triggering action: a detractor alert, an owner task, a health score input. If your current tool has workflows attached we can wire it into HubSpot, but native surveys skip that integration entirely and put every response next to the account history where decisions get made.
What goes into the health signal model?
Data you actually have: ticket volume and severity trend, survey scores, engagement with emails and meetings, and product usage where an integration exists. We start simple, weight the inputs transparently, and tune after a quarter of comparing scores against real outcomes. No black-box scoring.
Related modules
Self-Service, Knowledge Base & Customer Portal Implementation
Self-Service, Knowledge Base and Customer Portal Implementation is an engagement that stands up HubSpot's ...
Customer Agent Configuration & Deployment
Customer Agent Configuration and Deployment is an engagement that configures HubSpot's Breeze customer agent, ...
Help Desk Workspace & Agent Productivity Implementation
Help Desk Workspace and Agent Productivity Implementation is an engagement that configures HubSpot's help ...
Sounds like your situation?
30 minutes, your calendar, no slide deck. We tell you honestly whether this module fits.
Book discovery call