The problem this solves
One pipeline for every request type means a password reset and a contract escalation sit in the same queue with the same status options. Tickets age without a next step because 'In progress' covers everything from 'started five minutes ago' to 'stuck for two weeks'. Meanwhile the contract promises customers a first response within hours, and the only enforcement mechanism is whether someone happens to notice. Managers learn about breaches from the customer, not from the system.
How we work
We run a working session on your request types: what comes in, what each type needs to move from new to resolved, and where the current pipeline lies about reality. From that we design the pipeline architecture - sometimes one pipeline with better statuses, sometimes separate pipelines for support, onboarding, and internal requests, each with stages that mean one specific thing.
Then we implement SLA policies in Service Hub: time to first reply and time to close targets, working hours so weekend tickets do not count as breaches, and escalation workflows that fire before a breach instead of after. Required properties per stage keep tickets categorised well enough that reporting stays honest.
The result is a ticketing system where status means something, aging is visible, and SLA attainment is a report you pull, not a guess you defend.
Deliverables
- Pipeline architecture document covering all request types
- Configured pipelines with written stage definitions
- SLA policies with working hours and priority tiers
- Pre-breach escalation workflows and alerts
- Required-property rules per stage for clean categorisation
- SLA attainment and ticket aging dashboard