AI in the company

AI training on your own processes and data.

A day with your team, working with models on your own materials: your emails, your documents, your process. I start by counting how long reading and retyping takes today, and finish with a set of applications people have ready to use the next morning. The day runs for eight hours, online, in blocks.

Network delivery illustration
AI in the company

Six things the team does on its own after the day.

Integracje HubSpot

Writing replies to enquiries

The model drafts a first version from company materials; a person checks it and sends it. I show where swapping writing for checking actually saves time, and where it stops making sense.

Finanse i rozliczenia

The company voice in generated text

A model without instructions writes like a translation engine. The team learns to capture how the company writes, and to give negative instructions: the list of what a text must never contain.

Obsługa zamówień

A quality gate on the human side

Instead of reading every text from scratch, the team learns two or three repeatable edits after which a text stops looking generated. This is the part that decides whether the tool is still in use in a month.

Operacje wewnętrzne

Pulling answers out of customer history

Asking a plain-language question against emails, notes and transcripts: who asked about a product, where the conversation stopped, why a customer left. Including how to ask so the answer can be saved back onto the record.

Synchronizacja danych

Summaries of meetings, notes and reports

Summaries, weekly reports and record notes built from data the company already holds, together with the rule on when a meeting may be recorded and when consent has to come first.

Raporty i alerty

Working with models day to day

Company accounts instead of private ones, usage rules on one page, cost control, and knowing which data must not be pasted anywhere.

AI in the company

The day stands on your material, a counted number and the practice that follows it.

Warstwa no-code

Exercises on your own material

The exercises run on your emails, your documents and your price list. Course material teaches the tool; company material teaches the work. I agree beforehand which documents may be used in the room.

Warstwa kodu

A number counted before and after

At the start I count how many minutes one run of the process takes, times how often it runs, times how many people do it. At the end I count the same thing again. The gap between those two numbers is the only honest result of the day.

Warstwa danych

Boundaries set before anything runs

I once saw a chat assistant answer a customer's question about the company's client mix, and that ended the project. Since then the list of excluded topics gets written before launch. I do the same for your applications in the room.

Natywnie w HubSpocie

A practice regime afterwards

Two to three weeks of working with what people took from the day, before anything new gets added. Then a review: what stuck and what went back to old habits. Resistance in the first weeks is normal and passes, provided the leadership does not let it slide.

AI in the company

Six blocks, eight hours, one day.

01Mapuj

Opening with the leadership, 30 minutes

Which process should come off the team's plate, and how you will know it did. The programme gets built from that answer rather than from a list of features.

02Mapuj

The team shows how it works, 90 minutes

Each person shares a screen and does what they do every day. I are not looking for anyone to blame; I are looking for the places where the work is reading, summarising and retyping the same content. Every observation goes into minutes times repetitions times people.

03Mapuj

Working with models on your material, 150 minutes

The longest block of the day and the only one where the participants click and I do not. Each person builds an application for their own work, on company documents, and takes it to the point where the output is sendable after two edits.

04Mapuj

Boundaries: data, consent and cost, 60 minutes

What the model must not be told and must not be shown. When a data processing agreement is needed and when a company account is enough. How to set a monthly limit so the invoice holds no surprises.

05Mapuj

The team's starter kit, 90 minutes

Writing down what came out of block three in a form somebody absent from the session can use: applications per role, the company voice, the list of excluded topics.

06Mapuj

One number counted twice, and the plan, 60 minutes

I return to the number from block two and count it again, now after the session. Then the plan for two weeks: what people do daily, what I deliberately leave alone, and when the review happens.

Programme of the day

The programme follows the roles that sit in the session.

Roles on the team, processes to work through and the tools the company already has. The rest I confirm on the call.

Contact

Let me hear about which roles work in your team and where their time goes.

A few sentences are enough: what happens today, how many people are in it and in which roles. A work email address and a topic are enough to book the call.

Starter offer

An audit day or a training day to start working together.

Both have a fixed scope and take one working day. I quote a larger project only once I know what is really in it.

HubSpot8 hours

HubSpot portal audit day

  • Half an hour with leadership on the one number the company cares about
  • A read-only pass through the portal
  • Twenty minutes with each team member, up to four people
  • A document with fixes priced in hours, plus an hour to walk through it
AI in business8 hours, online

AI training day for your team

  • Six blocks in one day
  • Opening with leadership, 30 minutes
  • Hands-on work with the model on your team's materials
  • Recording and a starter kit for every role
AI in the company

Questions that come up on a first call.

How many people should take part?

Enough that everybody can still share a screen and build something. Past roughly a dozen it turns into a webinar, and a webinar changes nobody's Tuesday. For larger teams I split the day by role.

Do you train on our tools or yours?

On the ones you have or intend to have. If the choice has not been made, part of the boundaries block goes on picking a tool against your data and your legal requirements. A session on somebody's demo account teaches clicking.

Where do we find free AI training instead?

There is plenty of free material and it is worth using: provider courses, public programmes, vendor tutorials. They teach the tool in general, on examples your company does not have. This day sits on the other side of that: your material, your process, so the team leaves with work done rather than knowledge to translate later.

Our team already uses ChatGPT. Is this worth it?

Using it privately usually means three things at once: personal accounts, company data pasted without much thought, and text that reads as generated. The day sorts all three, and adds the applications people do not arrive at on their own because they need the model connected to company data.

Will AI replace our people?

In what I teach, the model writes a first version and a person checks and sends it. The mix of work changes: less writing from scratch, more verifying. Anything reaching a customer without a person is a separate decision, taken much later.

What about data security during the session?

I agree the scope of material before the day and keep it to what is needed. In regulated industries I start by checking whether the provider signs a data processing agreement; without one, that process does not go on the screen, however simple the technical answer looks.

Do we need an implementation after the training?

Sometimes. Work with a model on a document stays with the team after a day. An application that has to cross a whole database, or run without a person, has to be built, and then the training comes after it.

AI in the company

The programme follows what the team has to do the next morning.

<p>Tell me which roles your people work in and where their time goes. I come back with a programme, or with the honest answer that in your case training is not enough and something has to be built first.</p>