The problem this solves
Ambition and capability drift apart fast. Leadership wants AI in every process, but the data is fragmented, nobody owns prompt or workflow quality, tooling is a patchwork of personal subscriptions, and the one person who understands the stack becomes a bottleneck. Projects then stall not on model quality but on missing plumbing: access, skills, ownership, and process discipline.
How we work
We assess capability across five dimensions: data foundations, tooling and licensing, team skills, process maturity, and governance. The current-state picture is evidence-based: what your team can demonstrably do today, not what the org chart implies.
Then we define the target maturity your strategy actually requires, which is rarely the maximum. A mid-market B2B company does not need a machine learning platform team; it needs reliable data, a handful of well-run AI workflows, and clear ownership. Overshooting the target wastes as much as undershooting it.
The gap plan closes the engagement: what to train, hire, buy, or consolidate, sequenced so that foundational gaps close before the capabilities that depend on them.
Deliverables
- Capability assessment across data, tooling, skills, process, and governance
- Maturity model with current and target state
- Gap analysis with prioritized actions
- Skills and roles recommendation
- Tooling consolidation recommendation
- Sequenced capability-building plan