The problem this solves
Most companies approach AI backwards: a tool gets bought, a pilot gets launched, and six months later nobody can say what it changed. Use cases get picked by novelty rather than value, effort gets underestimated because data readiness is ignored, and finance rejects further budget because the first wave produced demos instead of outcomes. The result is AI fatigue before AI value.
How we work
We inventory candidate use cases systematically across marketing, sales, service, and operations: where hours are spent, which decisions repeat, what content gets produced, where response times hurt. The candidates come from your team's actual work, not from a vendor's feature list.
Each use case gets scored on impact, effort, and risk, with data readiness assessed honestly, because that is where most AI estimates collapse. For the top candidates we build business cases: assumptions stated, costs including licensing, expected effect anchored in your own baseline numbers, and how the result will be measured.
The output ends with a sequencing recommendation: what to do first, what waits, and what not to do at all, with reasoning attached to each.
Deliverables
- AI use case inventory across go-to-market functions
- Prioritization matrix scored on impact, effort, risk, and data readiness
- Business cases for the top-priority use cases
- Explicit do-not-do list with reasoning
- Sequencing recommendation
- Measurement approach per use case